26  28 March 2018
Royal Holloway, University of London
Department of Computer Science
The purpose of BCTCS is to bring together researchers in theoretical computer science to present their research and discuss future directions.
It aims to provide an environment in which PhD students can present their work, and get into contact with their peers and experienced researchers.
The scope of the colloquium includes all aspects of theoretical computer science, including automata theory, algorithms, complexity theory, semantics, formal methods, concurrency, types, languages and logics.
Update: The programme is now available.
Participants wishing to give a 30 minute contributed talk on any topic in the scope of the colloquium should email a title and abstract to bctcs18 [at] cs.rhul.ac.uk. Presentations from research students and early career researchers are particularly encouraged. Work need not be original and is not formally published. Contributions are not peer reviewed. The goal is discussion, networking, and feedback.
Submission deadline: 8 February 2018 (extended to account for organiser error)
Registration with accommodation should take place before 1 March 2018.
Registration without accommodation should take place before
8 March 2018.
Please register via the
online store (Update 1 Feb: access issues fixed, apologies for the inconvenience.).
There are three registration options, depending on your choice of accommodation. Accommodation includes breakfast and dinner, lunch is provided by the conference.
The BCTCS bursaries have been allocated, though you may request to be considered should any become free.
BCTCS will fund 10 bursaries of £210 for PhD. students who are giving a presentation.
To apply for a bursary, please contact
bctcs18 [at] cs.rhul.ac.uk
with a brief letter of support from your PhD.
supervisor.
John E. Hopcroft Cornell University
title:
Research in Deep Learning

Agata Ciabattoni TU Wien
title:
Intermediate logics: from hypersequents to parallel computation

Marta Kwiatkowska University of Oxford
title:
Safety Verification for Deep Neural Networks

Thomas Sauerwald University of Cambridge
title:
Randomised Distributed Algorithms

Alexandra Silva University College London
title:
tbc

09:00  Welcome & Registration 
09:30 
Invited Speaker
Marta Kwiatkowska
Deep neural networks have achieved impressive experimental results in image classification, but can surprisingly be unstable with respect to adversarial perturbations, that is, minimal changes to the input image that cause the network to misclassify it. With potential applications including perception modules and endtoend controllers for selfdriving cars, this raises concerns about their safety. This lecture will describe progress with developing a novel automated verification framework for deep neural networks to ensure safety of their classification decisions with respect to image manipulations, for example scratches or changes to camera angle or lighting conditions, that should not affect the classification. The techniques work directly with the network code and, in contrast to existing methods, can offer guarantees that adversarial examples are found if they exist. We implement the techniques using Z3 and evaluate them on stateoftheart networks, including regularised and deep learning networks. We also compare against existing techniques to search for adversarial examples.

10:30  Tea & Coffee 
11:00 
Probabilistic Systems
Mariia Vasileva
We evaluate numericallyprecise Monte Carlo (MC), QuasiMonte Carlo (QMC) and Randomized Monte Carlo (RQMC) methods for computing probabilistic reachability in hybrid systems with random parameters. Computing reachability probability amounts to computing (multidimensional) integrals. In particular, we pay attention to the QMC and RQMC methods due to their theoretical benefits in convergence speed with respect to the MC method. The KoksmaHlawka inequality is a standard result that bounds the approximation of an integral by QMC techniques. However, it is not useful in practice because it depends on the variation of the integrand function, which is in general difficult to compute. The question arises whether it is possible to apply statistical or empirical methods for estimating the approximation error. In this paper we compare a number of interval estimation techniques: Central Limit Theorem (CLT), Wilson, AgrestiCoul, Logit, Anscombe, Arcsine, Bayesian and Quint methods. We also introduce a new approach based on the CLT for computing confidence intervals for probabilities near the borders of the [0,1] interval. Based on our analysis, we provide justification for the use of the developed approach and suggest usage guidelines for probability estimation techniques.
This work was done in collaboration with Paolo Zuliani (paolo.zuliani@newcastle.ac.uk). David Purser
Differential privacy often relies upon manually crafted mathematical proofs, we look to use automatabased modelling to automatically verify differential privacy properties. The Kantorovich metric has been used to analyse bisimilarity of Markov chains (Desharnais et al., 2004) and probabilistic automata (van Breugel, Worrell, 2014) and was later generalised to analyse εdifferential privacy (Xu, Chatzikokolakis, Lin, 2014). We present a workinprogress to further generalise the Kantorovich metric to analyse ε,δdifferential privacy, using a distance introduced by Barthe et al. (2012). We consider its properties, how it can be calculated and problems it can be applied to.
Brendan Case
A common problem when designing Evolutionary Algorithms, in which a population of solutions undergo random mutation and natural selection to solve optimisation problems, is choosing the correct global parameters such as mutation rate and population size to achieve optimal behaviour. Further, there are numerous settings where the best choice of a fixed parameter is either unknown or cannot exist. How to apply such tuning strategies, and in which contexts they are actually effective, is not well understood particularly from a theoretical perspective. Tuning an individual’s mutation rate is one such strategy for which a number of different approaches have been explored. These include selfadjustment, where the mutation rate changes over time according to a global update scheme, and selfadaptation, in which the mutation rate is encoded into the gene of the individual itself. Using results from probability and runtime analysis, here we explore the latter, focusing on how selfadaptation of mutation rates can be shown to solve simple variablelength problem instances faster than their fixedmutation counterparts. We also attempt to gain better insight into whether a selfadapting population’s affinity for conservation using very low mutation rates can overtake the incentive of making progress using higher mutation rates.

12:30  Lunch 
14:00 
Matrices
Charlie Dickens
Work on approximate linear algebra has led to efficient distributed and streaming algorithms for problems such as approximate matrix multiplication, low rank approximation, and regression, primarily for the Euclidean norm l_2. We study other l_p norms, which are more robust for p < 2, and can be used to find outliers for p > 2. Unlike previous algorithms for such norms, we give algorithms that are (1) deterministic, (2) work simultaneously for every p >= 1, including p = ω, and (3) can be implemented in both distributed and streaming environments. We study l_pregression, entrywise l_plow rank approximation, and versions of approximate matrix multiplication.
Zak Tonks
James R. Bunch and John E. Hopcroft improved upon Strassen’s (1969) method for matrix inversion via fast matrix multliplication in 1974. Bunch–Hopcroft handled the case in which principal submatrices are singular, and presented a modification for pro vididing LU factorisation via this scheme. Such fast matrix multiplication techniques based on Strassen’s method recurse via 7 multiplications on submatrices instead of the naı̈ve 8, and such methods achieve a worst case complexity of O(n^ω) where ω = log_2 7. However, Bunch–Hopcroft’s method assumes that the input matrix is over a field — in particular the recursive nature of the algorithm requires that certain elements and sub determinants are invertible. But this is not always true of a ring, and in doing Computer Algebra we are most interested in rings of polynomials. In this presentation a fraction free formulation of the algorithm is presented that is most suitable for (dense) matrices of sparse polynomials, where the intention is that such a method should be more efficient than interpolation methods in this case. In such a way, it is attempted to provide for these matrix inversion methods what Bareiss–Dodgson did for Gaussian Elimination.

15:00  Short Break 
15:15 
Learning
Elena Zamaraeva
We say that a set S of points completely specifies a function f within some class of Boolean functions if for any other function g from this class there exists a point x in S such that f(x) and g(x) differ. The minimum number of points in S is the specification number of f. The interest to the specification number of f is due to its connection to the complexity of learning with membership queries, namely, the specification number of f is a lower bound of the complexity of learning with membership queries for f. It was shown in [S.T. Hu. Threshold Logic, 1965] that the specification number of a threshold function of n variables is at least n+1. In [M. Anthony, et al. On specifying Boolean functions by labelled examples. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 1995] it was proved that this bound is attained for nested functions and conjectured that for all other threshold functions the specification number is strictly greater than n+1. We resolve this conjecture negatively by exhibiting threshold Boolean functions of n variables, which are nonnested and for which the specification number is n+1. Our next goal is to characterize all threshold functions with the minimum specification number. We will present some progress towards this goal.
Rahul Vaish
It has been observed that many students lack confidence or soon get unconfident during the process of Online Assessment Tests. The reasons can vary from cultural, examination fear, past experiences, and others. This paper presents how Machine Learning can enhance examinees’ confidence level while he/she is undergoing the Assessment Test. In our study, we have determined and compared the variation in confidence patterns versus the sequence of questions encountered during the online examination. The proposed intelligent approach will recommend the most suitable pattern of questions before the examinees that will help them keep motivated and confident during the entire activity.
Grzegorz Muszynski
We address the problem of algorithm tracking changes in the topology of connected components of scalar fields on the geometric object such as grids. In particular, the algorithm will be discussed based on the UnionFind or DisjointSet data structure that time complexity was bounded to O(log*(n)) by John Hopcroft in 1973. In this talk, I will also give some examples from our ongoing study of extreme weather events.

16:45  Tea & Coffee 
17:15 
London Mathematical Society Lecture
John E. Hopcroft
A major advance in AI occurred
in 2012 when AlexNet won the
ImageNat competition with a deep
network. The success was
sufficiently better than
previous years that deep
networks were applied in many
applications with great success.
However, there is little
understanding of why deep
learning works. This talk will
illustrate current research
directions in the area at a
level for a general scientific
audience.

18:30  Drinks Reception 
9:00 
Invited Speaker

10:00  Tea & Coffee 
10:30 
Logics and Verification
Simon Docherty
In recent years the key principles behind Separation Logic have been generalized to generate formalisms for a number of verification tasks in program analysis via the formulation of 'nonstandard' models utilizing notions of separation distinct from heap disjointness. These models can typically be characterized by a separation theory, a collection of firstorder axioms in the signature of the model's underlying ordered monoid. While all separation theories are interpreted by models that instantiate a common mathematical structure, many are undefinable in Separation Logic itself and determine different classes of valid formulae, leading to incompleteness for existing proof systems.
Generalizing systems utilized in the proof theory of bunched logics (the underlying propositional basis of Separation Logic), we propose a framework of tableaux calculi that are generically extendable by rules corresponding to coherent formulae. All separation theories in the literature  as well as axioms for a number of related formalisms appropriate for reasoning about complex systems, security, and concurrency  can be presented as coherent formulae, and so this framework yields proof systems suitable for the zoo of separation logics and a range of other logics with applications across computer science. Parametric soundness and completeness of the framework is proved by a novel representation of tableaux systems as coherent theories, suggesting a strategy for implementation and a tentative first step towards a new logical framework for nonclassical logics. (Joint work with David Pym) Andrew LewisSmith
We investigate intermediate logics that retain a weak form of contraction. Whereas intermediate logics are generally constructive and wellunderstood prooftheoretically, the same cannot be said for logics with restricted contraction. This is partly because such systems have a rich semantic motivation, being manyvalued or "fuzzy." The result is that the majority of work in such logics focus on algebraic and semantic aspects, downplaying questions of proof. Indeed, the lack of a sufficiently workedout proof theory is even worse in the case of socalled intermediate logics with fuzzy semantics. Generalized Basic Logic (GBL) is one such logic, extending the Basic Logic (BL) of Hajek by adding prelinearity to the axioms. We have succeeded in extending an algebraic semantics of Urquhart to GBL ( from Hajek's BL), have proven soundness for BL under this semantics, and are currently working on the completeness result. We have identified a connection with Kripke frames in the work of BovaMontagna which could help simplify the existent approaches to fuzzy logic as it extends Kripke frames to the case of unitinterval. In the fullness of time we intend to algebraically characterize the relation between BMframes, Kripke frames, and Totallyordered commutative monoids.
Gleifer Vaz Alves
Autonomous Systems (AS) are largely applied in critical and reliable systems, like Autonomous Vehicles (AV), Aircrafts, Robots, and so on. Thus, one should be concerned with formal verification techniques in order to properly check whether the AS is working as designed. Model Checking can be applied for AS, but when we have an AS with properties and behaviour which are constantly changing. We shall take into account the Model Checking Program technique, where one could verify the own code of an AS.
An AS can be represented by means of an intelligent agent (or multiagents). We may describe the behaviour of an AS through agent believes, plans and goals (within the socalled BDI agent architecture). Now it is necessary to formally verify our intelligent agent. This can be done with the MCAPL (Model Checking Agent Programming Language) framework [1]. With MCAPL one may write agent code with an agent programming language, for instance, Gwendolen, then formally verify it with AJPF (Agent Java Path Finder) where one should write formal specification using a formal language based on temporal logic. With this in mind, we aim to apply the MCAPL framework towards the formal verification of AV (e.g., cars, underwater vehicles). In a previous work [2], we have initially established the SAE (Simulate Automotive Environment), which is used to formally verify a simple intelligent agent controlling the basic behaviour of an autonomous car. In [2], we have written formal specifications with PSL (Property Specification Language), which is the formal language of AJPF where one can write specifications using temporal logic operators. owever, in order to properly specify the behaviour of an AS, we could extend PSL language with deontic logic operators. By using deontic operators it would be possible to formally specify scenarios where the behaviour of our intelligent agent could be allowed or forbidden. For instance, a given autonomous car is forbidden to cross a red signal light (on a junction), unless the agent believes there is an emergency situation, then it necessary to change the agent behaviour from forbidden to allowed. As a result, our goal is to define a temporaldeontic based logic that can be used to formally specify properties within the MCAPL framework. [1] L. Dennis, M. Fisher, M. Webster, and R. Bordini, Model checking agent programming languages, Automated Software Engineering, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 563, 2012. [2] Fernandes, L. E. R.; Custodio, V.; Alves, G. V.; Fisher, M. A Rational Agent Controlling an Autonomous Vehicle: Implementation and Formal Verification. In Proceedings First Workshop on Formal Verification of Autonomous Vehicles, Turin, Italy, 19th September 2017, edited by Lukas Bulwahn, Maryam Kamali, and Sven Linker, 257:35?42. Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science. Open Publishing Association, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.257.5. Tobias Rosenberger
Software services, deployed on various machines, in the cloud, Internet of Things devices, etc and cooperating to perform their various tasks, play an increasingly important role in modern economy. In many cases, incorrect behaviour of these services would put lives, health, property or privacy at risk, be it because they handle money, handle confidential data, control vehicles, exchange records of prescribed or performed medical treatments, etc.
It is obviously desirable to ensure certain safety and security properties of these software services in a way suitable to and taking advantage of their distinct characteristics. We will explore what the characteristic properties of services are and sketch how these inform a toolsupported development process for formally verified software that is tailored to systems composed of services. 
12:30  Lunch 
14:00 
Invited Speaker
Thomas Sauerwald
Randomised Algorithms are algorithms which are able to use random bits in order to determine the next step. Such algorithms tend to be more elegant and easier to implement, and in some cases they are even provably superior to any deterministic solution.
In this talk we will start by giving a brief introduction into the field of randomised algorithms. We will then study two more specific examples of randomised algorithms in the context of large distributed networks, including (i) an algorithm for load balancing based on randomised rounding and (ii) an algorithm for reaching consensus based on random sampling. 
15:00  Short Break 
15:15 
Distributed Systems
Gary Bennett
In a distributed system there are times where a single entity temporarily acts as a coordinator, controlling all of the other entities in the system during the execution of a task. The need for a coordinator arises where having one simplifies the solution or because it is intrinsic to the problem. The classic problem of choosing such a coordinator is known as Leader Election. In this short talk, we present a brief historical overview of Leader Election as well as some insights from our ongoing research, investigating asynchronous (and possibly selfstabilising) Leader Election algorithms derived from, recently published research, "On the Complexity of Universal Leader Election" [JACM 2015].
Radu Ștefan Mincu
In a multichannel Wireless Mesh Networks (WMN), each node is able to use multiple nonoverlapping frequency channels. Raniwala et al. (Mobile Computing and Communications Review 2004, INFOCOM 2005) propose and study several such architectures in which a computer can have multiple network interface cards. These architectures are modeled as a graph problem named maximum edge qcoloring and studied in several papers by Feng et. al (TAMC 2007), Adamazek and Popa (ISAAC 2010, Journal of Discrete Algorithms 2016). Later on Larjomaa and Popa (IWOCA 2014, Journal of Graph Algorithms and Applications 2015) define and study an alternative variant, named the minmax edge qcoloring.
The above mentioned graph problems, namely the maximum edge qcoloring and the minmax edge qcoloring are studied mainly from the theoretical perspective. In this paper, we study the minmax edge qcoloring problem from a practical perspective. More precisely, we introduce, implement and test three heuristic approximation algorithms for the minmax edge qcoloring problem. These algorithms are based on local search methods like basic hill climbing, simulated annealing and tabu search techniques. Although several algorithms for particular graph classes were proposed by Larjomaa and Popa (e.g., trees, planar graphs, cliques, bicliques, hypergraphs), we design the first algorithms for general graphs. We study and compare the running data for all three algorithms on Unit Disk Graphs, as well as some graphs from the DIMACS vertex coloring benchmark dataset. This is joint work with Alexandru Popa. 
16:15  Tea & Coffee 
16:45 
Biological Systems
Hanadi Alkhudhayr
Boolean networks are a widely used qualitative modelling approach which allows the abstract description of a biological system. One issue with the application of Boolean networks is the state space explosion problem which limits the applicability of the approach to large realistic systems. In this paper we investigate developing a compositional framework for Boolean networks to facilitate the construction and analysis of large scale models. The compositional approach we present is based on merging entities between Boolean networks using conjunction and we introduce the notion of compatibility which formalises the preservation of behaviour under composition. We investigate characterising compatibility and develop a notion of trace alignment which is sufficient to ensure compatibility. The compositional framework developed is supported by a prototype tool that automates composition and analysis.
Thomas Wright
We present the bondcalculus, a process algebra for modelling biological and chemical systems featuring nonlinear dynamics, multiway interactions, and dynamic bonding of agents. Mathematical models based on differential equations have been instrumental in modelling and understanding instrumental in understanding the dynamics of biological systems. Quantitative process algebras aim to build higher level descriptions of biological systems, capturing the agents and interactions underlying their behaviour, and can be compiled down to a range of lower level mathematical models. The bondcalculus b! uilds upon the work of Kwiatkowski, Banks, and Stark's continuous picalculus by adding a flexible multiway communication operation based on pattern matching and general kinetic laws. The language has a compositional semantics based on vector fields and linear operators, allowing simulation and analysis through extraction of differential equations. We apply our framework to V. A. Kuznetsov's classic model of immune response to tumour growth, demonstrating the key features of our language, whilst validating the link between the dynamics of the model and our conceptual understanding of immune action and capturing the behaviour of the agents in a modular and extensible manner.
Rayan Alnamnakany
An organism is made of a number of components, including RNA and protein. Recent studies show that the posttranscriptional level is critically regulated by a number of transcriptfactors, including miRNAs and RBPs. The expression of a gene mainly depends on the interaction between RBPs and miRNAs RNAbinding proteins and microRNA are considered as two of the important factors in regulating the expression of genes. RBPs and MicroRNAs have been involved in a number of human diseases, such as cancers. Identifying RNAprotein interactions have become one of the central questions in biomedical research as understating this mechanism may give the chance to design new medicines that cure diseases. These two factors can work competitively or cooperatively between each other, and either indirectly or directly in order to adjust the expression of their target mRNAs. The brand new topic emerges of designing algorithms and software tools that account for the interplay between microRNA and RBPs in posttranscriptional regulation. At present, there is only a single Bioinformatics tool, namely SimiRa that addresses the issue of microRNA RBP cooperation. The tool has been made public only a couple of months ago. While SimiRa relies on geneexpression data analysis and pathway features, the proposed research aims at the performance analysis of different Machine Learning Methods in regard to the prediction of mRNA regulation by microRNAs and RBPs. the proposed research will focus on structural elements, i.e., features of microRNA binding sites as well as RBP binding sites in secondary RNA structures, including metastable RNA secondary structures.

18:15  BCTCS Ordinary General Meeting (30 minutes) 
19:30  Banquet 
9:00 
Invited Speaker

10:00  Tea & Coffee 
10:30 
Algebra
Tobias Kappé
Kleene Algebra (KA) is a successful framework for studying program flow; it sports a simple yet expressive syntax, as well as efficient algorithms for model checking. Recently, Concurrent Kleene Algebra (CKA) has been proposed by Hoare et al. as an extension of KA, aimed at incorporating concurrent composition. We shall review some hurdles recently taken in the process of extending the toolkit of KA to one for CKA, as well as some problems yet to tackle.
Alexander P. Jeffery
Runtime safety of Lambda And Session Types (LAST) with asynchronous session types is a well established result [1]. Implicit function types have recently arisen as a powerful abstraction mechanism for lambda calculus [2]. We introduce implicit function types to LAST, and generalise the concept of an implicit function to an implicit message, a concurrent analogue of implicit functions. We argue that the resulting system provides useful abstractions for programming languages with session types. We formalise the system and prove type soundness.
[1] Linear type theory for asynchronous session types  S.J. Gay, V.T. Vasconcelos. Cambridge University Press, 2009. [2] Simplicitly: Foundations and applications of implicit function types  M. Odersky et al. ACM POPL, 2018 Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh
Recent work on compositional distributional models of natural language shows that bialgebras over finite dimensional vector spaces can model generalised quantifiers. This technique requires one to construct the vector space over powersets, and therefore is computationally costly. In this paper, we overcome this problem by considering fuzzy versions of quantifiers along the lines of Zadeh, within the category of many valued relations. We show that this category is a concrete instantiation of the compositional distributional model. We show that the semantics obtained in this model is equivalent to the semantics of the fuzzy quantifiers of Zadeh. As a result, we are now able to treat fuzzy quantification without requiring a powerset construction.
Joint work of Matej Dostal, Czech Technical University, Prague, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh and Gijs Wijnholds, School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science,Queen Mary University of London. 
12:00  Lunch 
13:30 
Matching Problems
William Pettersson
The stable matching problem matches pairs of agents from two distinct sets to optimise some particular objective. In this talk, I will show how the stable matching problem can be applied to find adoptive families for children in need of loving, permanent homes. In such a problem, each familychild pair is given a score, based on certain attributes of the child and family. These can easily be converted into instances of a stable matching problem, and if these instances are small enough they can be directly solved, however larger instances may be intractable. We demonstrate two methods of adapting this conversion process to produce limited instances which still produce stable matchings with suitable sizes and total scores.
This particular problem also has a second interesting aspect. The aforementioned scores are not the ultimate decider of a pairing. Some of the factors relevant to a child and family are not quantifiable, and as such are not reflected in the scores attributed to the instance. Instead, the expectation is that a social worker has the final ability to select the correct matching for each child. With this in mind, we also discuss ways of adapting the problem to present, for each child, a limited selection of families such that the final solution still satisfies some set of expected outcomes, such as stability. Frances Cooper
In universities all over the world, students must be assigned to dissertation projects as part of their degree programmes. In many cases students are required to rank a subset of the available projects in order of preference, and likewise, lecturers rank in order of preference those students who have applied for their projects. A centralised allocation is then conducted which gives a matching of students to projects. A key consideration is that the matching should be stable, which ensures that no student and lecturer who are not matched together have an incentive to form an assignment with one another after the matching has been announced. In this talk we consider the case where preference lists need not be strictly ordered, and may contain ties. In this scenario stable matchings can be of different sizes and it is known that the problem of finding a maximumsized stable matching is NPhard. We present an approximation algorithm for this problem that has a performance guarantee of 3/2.
Sofiat Olaosebikan
Matching problems generally involve assigning a set of agents to another set of agents based on the preferences of the agents and some problemspecific constraints. This class of problems was first studied by Gale and Shapley. We present an example of a matching problem, the StudentProject Allocation problem with preferences over Projects (SPAP), which involves a set of students, projects and lecturers. Each project is offered by one lecturer, and both projects and lecturers have capacity constraints. Each lecturer and student has preferences over acceptable projects. We seek a matching which is an allocation of students to projects that respects these preferences and capacities. We also seek to ensure that no student and lecturer could improve relative to their current assignment by forming an arrangement outside the matching involving some project, a concept termed stability.
Given an instance of SPAP, stable matchings can have different sizes. This naturally leads to the problem of finding a maximum cardinality stable matching (MAXSPAP), which is NPhard. Manlove and O’Malley gave an approximation algorithm to solve MAXSPAP with a performance guarantee of 2. Subsequently, Iwama et al. described an improved approximation algorithm with a performance guarantee of 32. We describe an Integer Programming (IP) formulation to enable MAXSPAP to be solved optimally. Finally, we present some experimental results arising from an empirical analysis that compares the approximation algorithms and the IP model for randomly generated SPAP instances. This is joint work with David Manlove, Duncan Milne. 
15:00  Tea & Coffee 
15:30 
Graphs and Constraints
Andrew LewisPye
While the problem of finding short paths in graphs has been extensively studied, the situation changes dramatically when one restricts to the case of graphs satisfying conditions like the small world property, common to most networks seen in nature. I'll discuss recent work in which my coauthors Huang, Li and Pan and I introduce the idemetric property, which formalises the idea that most nodes in a graph have similar distances between them, and which we suggest is likely to be satisfied by many smallworld network models. As evidence for this claim, we have shown, for example, that the WattsStrogatz model is idemetric for a wide range of parameters. For graphs with the idemetric property, it is easily observed that the allpairs shortest path problem can be reduced to the singlesource shortest path problem, so long as one is prepared to accept solutions which are of stretch close to 2 with high probability. So the suggestion is that this is a common property, giving rise to very efficient short path finding algorithms in contexts where O(n) preprocessing is permitted.
Ciaran McCreesh
The subgraph isomorphism problem is to find a copy of a little "pattern" graph inside a larger "target" graph. Despite being NPcomplete, practical algorithms can often solve instances with graphs involving many thousands of vertices. I will give an overview of applied subgraph isomorphism solving, and present a rough outline of the state of the art algorithm that has been developed at Glasgow over the past several years. This algorithm does nothing to improve theoretical worstcase complexity, but in practice it is many orders of magnitude better than earlier algorithms. To justify this claim, I will discuss how we evaluate subgraph isomorphism algorithms empirically, with a particular focus on what makes the problem hard in practice. For the noninduced variant of the problem on randomly generated pattern and target graphs, we see a satisfiable / unsatisfiable phase transition and a corresponding complexity peak which is similar to what we see with random boolean satisfiability instances, but with induced or labelled variants of the problem, much richer behaviour arises. Finally, I'll explain the connection between "really hard" instances and the design of search order strategies.
Joint work with Patrick Prosser and James Trimble. Hoda Abbasizanjani
A wide range of computational problems can be represented as a propositional satisfiability problem (SAT), where SAT solvers can decide whether the problem is satisfiable or not. However, in many cases knowing that a problem or a system is unsatisfiable (inconsistent) is not enough and further information on the reasons of unsatisfiability is required. SAT problems are usually represented by clausesets (conjunctive normal forms as setsystems). Every unsatisfiable clauseset can have many minimally unsatisfiable subclausesets (unsatisfiable formulas without redundancy) which are considered as the reasons of unsatisfiability.
We consider minimal unsatisfiability problem and we use the deficiency of a clauseset (the difference between the number of clauses and the number of variables) as a measure for classifying minimally unsatisfiable clausesets (MUs). It is conjectured that for a fixed deficiency, MUs can be reduced to finitely many patterns. In this talk, we investigate the basic patterns for MUs with small deficiencies. Joshua Blinkhorn
The central question in proof complexity can be stated as follows: Given a logical theory and a provable theorem, what is the size of the shortest proof? Proof complexity is intrinsically linked to recent noteworthy innovations in solving, owing to the fact that any decision procedure implicitly defines a proof system for the underlying language. Moreover, proofsize lower bounds correspond to best case scenarios for the solver's consumption of computational resources, namely time and memory. Arguably more important than the lower bounds themselves is the introduction of general techniques for showing them.
In the talk, we introduce a new technique for proofsize lower bounds in various proof systems for quantified Boolean formulas (QBF), the prototypical PSPACEcomplete language. Our technique is based on two semantic measures: the `cost' of a QBF, and the `capacity' of a proof. Relating these two measures in the context of strategy extraction, our central theorem provides absolute lower bounds on proof size over a family of natural QBF proof systems. We exemplify the technique by proving the hardness of a new family of QBFs representing equality. Our main application provides the first `genuine' proofsize lower bounds for random QBFs, which apply to the QBF analogues of Resolution, Cutting Planes, and Polynomial Calculus. This is joint work with Olaf Beyersdorff and Luke Hinde. 
The event takes place on the campus of Royal Holloway in the historic town of Egham, which lies between London and Windsor.
Talks will take place in the
Moore Bulding Lecture Theatre.
A campus map is
available in PDF
or
your favourite online map.
Accommodation from 2528 March is available on campus as part of the registration fee.
This is very convenient for the conference.
Three options will be available during registration:
Accommodation checkin is at
The Hub Reception.
Accommodation will include breakfast and dinner.
Lunch is provided as part of the conference.
A banquet will be held on 27 March.
Additionally there is bed and breakfast accommodation
nearby, and a
Travelodge
15 minutes walk away.
The Royal Holloway Conference Service provides uptodate travel information. We summarise this information below.
The nearest train station is Egham which is a 1520 minute walk from Royal Holloway. Train journeys can be planned via National Rail.
Royal Holloway is located on the A30, 19 miles from central London and about a mile south west of the town of Egham.
It is two miles from junction 13 of the M25 (London orbital).
After leaving the motorway at junction 13, take the A30 west, signposted to Bagshot and Camberley (this is the Egham bypass).
At the first roundabout, take the second exit.
At the second roundabout, take the second exit and continue up the A30, Egham Hill.
The College is on the left at the top of the hill.
There is plenty of free parking, but please contact
bctcs18 [at] cs.rhul.ac.uk
if you would like to enquire about a specific space.
Sat nav postcode is TW20 0EX.
We recommend that you book in advance from the following companies.
Train connections to the London airports can be checked/booked through the website of
National Rail.
From Heathrow, taxi or bus are by far the best options.
The number 8 runs between Heathrow Terminal 5 and Royal Holloway.
From all other terminals, Terminal 5 can be reached from the
Heathrow Central Station.
An uptodate timetable can be found
here.
An uptodate map near RHUL can be found
here.
The nearest bus stop to Royal Holloway is a few minutes from campus.
If you have any questions or inquiries about bctcs2018 you can contact us